With regards to key directors of comapnies owning shares to align interest with shareholders. If let say a chairman has an indirect owning majority of the shares in a company(e.g. he owns an investment holding thenhisinvestment holding has majority stake in the company), can I say that this would be the ideal case as compare to the chairman directly owning majority of shares?
*For clarity of this question, you may refer to the example on silverlake axis limited annual report 2011 pg114.
Thank you,
Hmm…there should be no difference owning directly or indirectly…if the chairman owns majority stake in the investment holding company (which usually is set up for tax planning purposes).
You are right Ang Chor. :)